Wednesday, August 1, 2007

smaller bombs are not the answer

The head of NATO this week announced that in an effort to shore up the faltering mission in Afghanistan NATO would reduce the size of the bombs that it was using. By using smaller bombs, the reasoning goes, there will be fewer civilian casualties, and hence less of a drop amongst ordinary Afghans for the NATO-led ISAF.

The logic is mind-blowing. That the present dilemma in Afghanistan is a man-made mistake, predictable, and will continue to deepen Afghanistan's many conflicts was foreshadowed by me in an on-line column in October 2001. That it was written almost 6 years ago is a reminder that what has happened did not have to happen as it happened. This was, to use a phrase of Donald Rumsfeld, 'a known known'.

The link to the original article, 'Attacking the Pakhtuns', is:

http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/justpeace/110akram.htm

Check it out.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

http://lumerkoz.edu So where it to find?, http://www.lovespeaks.org/profiles/blogs/buy-enalapril oppositions http://www.comicspace.com/celexa/ blank http://soundcloud.com/aricept oscesaimir http://soundcloud.com/prevacid kills http://www.comicspace.com/cheap_biaxin/ plunged

Blog Archive