This is an interesting analysis by Justin Sandefur of the Center for Global Development in Washington. I don't agree with all of it, but the challenge that he lays down to the Gates Foundation and their emphasis on agricultural innovation is on the mark.
The Epistle of Gates and the Gospel of Agricultural Innovation
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Occasional news and views on international development
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Haroon Akram-Lodhi
Haroon on the internet
Haroon's links
- Actionaid international
- Applied research in economics group
- Bretton woods project
- Campaign against the arms trade
- Canadian Catholic organization for development and peace
- Canadian centre for policy alternatives
- Catholic agency for overseas development
- Charity navigator: your guide to intelligent giving
- CLOC: Coordinadora latinoamericana de organizaciones del campo
- Conference of socialist economists
- The council of Canadians
- Eldis: the best in development, policy, practice and research
- farmsubsidgy.org: discover who gets what from the common agricultural policy
- FIAN: fighting hunger with human rights
- Focus on the global south
- Food first: institute for food and development policy
- Friends of the earth
- Gender responsive budgeting
- Grain
- Heterodox economics newsletter
- Ideas: International development economics associates
- Institute for agriculture and trade policy
- International association for feminist economics
- International land coalition
- International policy centre for inclusive growth
- La via campesina: the international peasant's movement
- La via campesina youth
- LRAN: Land research action network
- The market share matrix
- Marx and Engels internet archive
- Mojo: the music magazine
- Monthly review
- MST: Brazil's landless worker's movement
- National farmer's union Canada
- New internationalist
- New left review
- The north-south institute
- One world: promoting human rights awareness and fighting poverty worldwide
- Open democracy
- Our world is not for sale
- Oxfam international
- Pluralist economics review
- Policy innovations: the central address for a fairer globalization
- Post-autistic economics network
- The progressive economics forum
- Q-squared: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in poverty analysis
- Raj Patel
- The Robinson Rojas archive
- School Lunch Box
- SPI: Indonesia's peasant union
- Third world network
- Transnational institute
- Union for radical political economics
- Via campesina Africa
- The Whirled Bank Group
- Women in development Europe
- World development movement
Previous Posts
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- agrarian question
- aid
- and
- anti-apartheid
- Arab Spring
- Brazil
- Cambodia
- Canada
- capital
- children
- China
- class
- cocoa
- conflict
- Congo
- crisis
- democracy
- development co-operation
- economic crisis
- economic development
- education
- Egypt
- elections
- feminist development economics
- fertility
- food crisis
- food regimes
- food sovereignty
- gender
- Ghana
- global finance capital
- globalization
- GMOs
- governance
- Haiti
- health
- human rights
- income
- India
- indigenous
- inequality
- international development studies
- Iran
- Iraq
- justice
- Kenya
- Kony 2012
- labour
- Land
- land grabbing
- Maoism
- Marxist economics
- Microfinance
- Middle East
- militarism
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- natural resources
- Nelson Mandela
- neoliberalism
- occupy
- organic agriculture
- Pakistan
- Palestine
- peasants
- population
- poverty
- Raj Patel
- resistance
- right to food
- rufugees
- rural development
- Slow food
- social development
- Somalia
- Southeast Asia
- Sudan
- surplus value
- terrorism
- Thatcherism
- transgenics
- Trent University
- Tunisia
- United Kingdom
- unpaid care work
- Vietnam
- water
- women
- World Bank
- Yemen
1 comment:
Although I can imagine you don't agree. Could you share your insights? :)
Post a Comment